<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
On 04/20/2011 06:44 PM, Art Kelly wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:593564.77330.qm@web65906.mail.ac4.yahoo.com"
type="cite">
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="font: inherit;" valign="top"><br>
<div class="tweet-content" sizset="0" sizcache="3566">
<div class="tweet-row"><span class="tweet-user-name"><span
class="tweet-full-name"><font color="#999999"></font></span>
</span>
<div class="tweet-corner">
<div class="tweet-meta"><span class="icons">
<div class="extra-icons"><span
class="inlinemedia-icons"></span></div>
</span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="tweet-row" sizset="0" sizcache="3218">
<div class="tweet-text">Robert Sungenis Embraces
"RadTradism" and Sadly Edges Closer to Outright
Schism in His Blistering Attacks and Slande... <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
class="twitter-timeline-link"
title="http://networkedblogs.com/gUgHG/"
href="http://nblo.gs/gUgHG" rel="nofollow"
target="_blank"
data-expanded-url="http://networkedblogs.com/gUgHG/"><font
color="#2d76b9">http://nblo.gs/gUgHG</font></a></div>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</blockquote>
Sungenis: . . . the universal salvation that John Paul II so often
promoted in his addresses and encyclicals.<br>
<br>
I was under the impression that Catholic "universalism" such as from
JPII was not absolute. They still maintain a "logical possibility"
(otherwise Jesus' warnings are meaningless) that some may be damned,
but *hope* for universal redemption. Is my impression correct?<br>
</body>
</html>