<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Long ago, Nostradamus foresaw that on 04/05/2012 08:45 AM, Dianne
Dawson would write:
<blockquote
cite="mid:1333629959.17719.YahooMailNeo@web110813.mail.gq1.yahoo.com"
type="cite">
<div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:tahoma,
new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt">
<div class="yiv367298996MsoNormal"><span></span><span
style="font-family: "sans-serif";"></span><span
style="font-family: "sans-serif"; font-size:
10pt;"><br>
<br>
Cecile Richards, the president of Planned Parenthood, has
been<br>
nominated to be Time Magazine's Person of the Year because
of her<br>
rising up to fight pro-life opposition in the last year. Can
you<br>
imagine the positive publicity PP would receive if that
happened?<br>
Click on the link and vote no. It takes less than 5 seconds
to do so.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: tahoma, new york, times, serif;
font-size: 12pt;">
<div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times,
serif; font-size: 12pt;">
<div id="yiv367298996">
<div>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: tahoma,
new york, times, serif; font-size: 12pt;
background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 12pt;"
class="yiv367298996MsoNormal"><span
style="font-family:
"sans-serif";"><a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0%2c28804%2c2107952_2107953_2109558%2c00.html?xid=fb-time100"
rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><span
id="yiv367298996lw_1333629441_0"
class="yiv367298996yshortcuts"><font
color="#234786">http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2107952_2107953_2109558,00.html?xid=fb-time100</font></span></a></span><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
The poll says that she (and the other candidates) were chosen
because they were *influential*. While Cecile was arguably an evil
influence, she was still very influential. There really needs to be
another dimension to the poll - whether the influence was morally
good or morally evil. They could have two persons on the year: most
influence for good, and most influence for evil - "christ" and
"antichrist". I'm not sure the magazine editors concept of "good"
and "evil" aligns very well with their readership, so that is
probably why they don't do this.<br>
<br>
P.S. I don't have time to read far left rags like Time. When I do
glance at an issue, the blatant deception on every page just makes
me angry.<br>
</body>
</html>