[Apologetics] My "fan" club
Art Kelly
arthurkelly at yahoo.com
Tue Jun 26 18:16:16 EDT 2007
Stephen,
I recommend you jump on his highly erroneous
statements immediately.
Don't let him swift boat you. (It's an American
expression. You wouldn't understand.)
And make it very clear that this guy is being highly
deceptive.
Art
--- Stephen Korsman <skorsman at theotokos.co.za> wrote:
> Hi
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Art Kelly
>
> Since he is unwilling to provide reciprocal
> courtesies
> to you, then you should provide all of the facts
> about
> his distortions and deceit on YOUR website.
>
> In fact, he has done you a favor.
>
> By trying to play with a stacked deck, he has
> exposed
> the fallacious nature of his modus operadi and
> cast
> great disrepute on the nature of all of his
> comments.
>
> Keep on eye on his website and then report on YOUR
> website what he is doing that is factually and
> intellectually in error.
> At the moment I save the website as PDF each time I
> see a new comment. I hope to put it all together
> next week.
>
> Now he's stated more explicitly:
>
> "Well, Stephen has emailed me saying he is not able
> to provide clear unequivocal Biblical evidence for
> the questions I asked him on this blog."
>
> I never said that. I don't know how such a
> statement could be sincere.
>
> I'll have each and every e-mail to and from him
> saved as PDFs as well, with text files for the
> headers, and have them available with my blog
> defence.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Stuart D. Gathman
>
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Stephen Korsman wrote:
>
> > And he's said that I don't allow comments on my
> blog, and also that I
> > said that I am unable to answer his questions.
>
> >
>
http://reinventingsdawheel.blogspot.com/2007/01/sabbath-musings-pt1.html
>
> He might have had technical difficulties on your
> blog and jumped to
> conclusions. (Wrong - but easy to do. Don't jump
> to conclusions yourself.)
> Please point out if you see me jumping to
> conclusions!!
>
> His comment at the last link above says:
>
> "It's interesting to note that Stephen Korsman blog
> does not allow people to respond. He has banned
> comments or participation."
>
> That doesn't sound like technical difficulties.
> It's a broad statement. Which I did misinterpret,
> but I don't think it's the same as below:
>
> On my blog it becomes:
>
> "As far comments being blocked, there are some posts
> that you are not allowing comments, I didn't say you
> blocked me personally."
>
> Since I worked out how to activate comments, there
> are very few where comments are closed; most are
> because I didn't actively set the comments on
> because I didn't think it was important enough to
> comment - I have few commentators; the rest I either
> forgot to set the comments on, or was having trouble
> with comments. He may be jumping to conclusions,
> but I think it's clear enough that he's not willing
> to give me the benefit of the doubt on much.
>
> Quite frankly, I don't want his sort of
> contribution. Maybe that sounds unfair, but I must
> draw the line somewhere. Civilised dialogue is
> fine, pontificating with no intent to give the other
> person a chance is not that.
>
> This is starting to leave me feeling a bit sick. It
> can only do me good - extra publicity, and a solid
> explanation with good evidence of his ... mischief?
>
> It's just hard to imagine what goes on inside the
> mind of someone like that. Is he the type that puts
> up billboards saying the Pope is the antichrist?
> Why is he so extreme without any apparent interest
> in actually discussing issues? Why the questions
> designed to be unanswerable?
>
> God bless,
> Stephen
> --- Stephen Korsman <skorsman at theotokos.co.za>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> >
>
>
http://www.theotokos.co.za/blog/post/index/387/Dr-Francis-Beckwith-comes-home
> >
> > Could you look at the comments section, and say
> if
> > you think I've done the wrong thing?
> >
> > Thanks for the moral support over at his blog
> ...
> >
> > It's not often someone sets up a blog like this.
>
> > It's a bit more than I was prepared for.
> >
> > He has deleted my comment on his blog commenting
> on
> > his change, where I quoted the original
> statement
> > mentioning me, and the revised version, so that
> the
> > original statement isn't visible, and inserted
> the
> > remainder of my comment later on.
> >
>
>
http://stephenkorsmanreviewed.blogspot.com/2007/06/deliver-us-from-evil.html
> >
> > I have a screen capture and a saved version of
> the
> > original blog post.
> >
> > And he's said that I don't allow comments on my
> > blog, and also that I said that I am unable to
> > answer his questions. Both untrue.
> >
>
>
http://reinventingsdawheel.blogspot.com/2007/01/sabbath-musings-pt1.html
> >
> > So far he's refused to link to my blog from his
> > blog, which is about me and my blog.
> >
> > Do I answer according to his rules, or just
> provide
> > an answer? If I provide an answer, it'll help
> other
> > readers, but he'll have a field day. I can
> always
> > add a bit about how his questions are loaded and
> > unfair, etc. I think that's the way I'll go.
> It
> > looks like he'll be after me for some time, so I
> > want to make my first attempt as strong as
> possible,
> > because I don't have the time to chase him
> around
> > the internet explaining myself each time he
> proposes
> > a new challenge. I want my first one to be
> lasting.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Stephen
> > --
> > Stephen Korsman
> > skorsman at theotokos.co.za
> > The Theotokos Website
> > A Rural Virologist || RSS feed
> > Sabbath Keepers || RSS feed
> >
> > IC | XC
> > ---------
> > NI | KA
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Stuart D. Gathman
> > To: Stephen Korsman
> > Cc: Apologetics Group
> > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 11:49 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Apologetics] My "fan" club
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Stephen Korsman wrote:
> >
> > > I suspect that they do allow historical
> > evidence, but only that that serves
> > > their belief system. Anything else, as you
> say,
> > is tainted by the evil
> >
> > Working out their belief system:
> >
> > In their view, apparently all (or almost all)
> of
> > Christianity went "off the
> > rails" shortly after the new testament
> documents -
> > on or before the
> > destruction of Jerusalem. Do they believe
> that a
> > "remnant" remained
> > faithful those thousands of years? Or is it
> like
> > Mormanism where God sent
> > their prophet to restore true faith to the
> earth
> > after it had disappeared?
> >
> > --
> > Stuart D. Gathman <stuart at bmsi.com>
> > Business Management Systems Inc. Phone:
> 703
> > 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
> > "Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus
> addictis"
> > - background song for
> > a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go
> > from here?" commercial.
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> > Apologetics mailing list
> > Apologetics at gathman.org
> > http://bmsi.com/mailman/listinfo/apologetics
> >
>
>
> ART KELLY, ATM-S
> 13524 Brightfield Lane
> Herndon, Virginia 20171-3360
> (703) 904-3763 home
> (703) 396-6956 work
> arthurkelly at yahoo.com
> art.kelly at cox.net
> ArtK135 at Netscape.net
>
>
>
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> Need Mail bonding?
> Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from
> Yahoo! Answers users.
>
>
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396546091
> _______________________________________________
> Apologetics mailing list
> Apologetics at gathman.org
> http://bmsi.com/mailman/listinfo/apologetics
>
ART KELLY, ATM-S
13524 Brightfield Lane
Herndon, Virginia 20171-3360
(703) 904-3763 home
(703) 396-6956 work
arthurkelly at yahoo.com
art.kelly at cox.net
ArtK135 at Netscape.net
____________________________________________________________________________________
We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love
(and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list.
http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265
More information about the Apologetics
mailing list