[Apologetics] National Right to Life: United Methodists Continue in Pro-Life Direction

[Art Kelly]

National Right to Life-----Original Message-----
From: nrlc at nrlc.org [mailto:nrlc at nrlc.org]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 6:47 PM
To: akelly at americantarget.com
Subject: TN&V -- United Methodists Continue in Pro-Life Direction 




           From National Right to Life 

      Today's News and Views
     
      Subscribe Now to the 
      "Pro-Life Newspaper of Record"!


























           Today's News & Views
            May 29, 2008

            United Methodist Church Continues to 
            Move in a More Pro-Life Direction
            Incremental But Significant Steps Taken
            By John Lomperis

            In 1972, America's second-largest Protestant denomination officially endorsed legalized abortion, as did other "mainline" American Protestant denominations around that same time. However, the April 23--May 2 meeting of the top policymaking body of the United Methodist Church took several incremental but significant steps to move in a more pro-life direction. Specifically, the 2008 United Methodist General Conference decided to:

              a.. "Affirm and encourage the Church to assist the ministry of crisis pregnancy centers and pregnancy resource centers that compassionately help women find feasible alternatives to abortion." 
              b.. Delete from a previously adopted statement the assertion that supporting legalized abortion was somehow "[i]n continuity with past Christian teaching." 
              c.. Replace "pro-choice" language in that same statement about "unacceptable pregnanc[ies]" with the pro-life assertion that "we are equally bound to respect the sacredness of the life and well-being of the mother and the unborn child." 
              d.. Decry the international problem of gender-selective abortions, while describing abortion as something that is "violent" and to be opposed when chosen for "trivial reasons." 
              e.. Support adult "notification and consent" for minors seeking abortions 
              f.. "Reject euthanasia and pressure upon the dying to end their lives." 
            Between 1988 and this year, pro-life United Methodists had succeeded in adding numerous improvements to their denomination's official statement on abortion, such as opposing abortion chosen for reasons of birth control or gender selection, opposing partial-birth abortions, and recognizing the reality of post-abortion stress. Some have argued that the first of these puts the church in opposition to most abortions in the U.S., as only a small minority are chosen for reasons related to rape, incest, or actual, severe physical health complications for the mother or child. 

            However, the denomination's main position statement still includes a single highly problematic sentence "support[ing] the legal option of abortion" during unspecified "tragic conflicts of life with life." This vague wording has been used by some United Methodist officials to align the denomination's public witness with the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice (RCRC), whose agenda is a no-compromise "abortion rights" utopia.

            The biggest pro-life disappointment at this General Conference was the affirmation of the denomination's continued affiliation with the RCRC, which stridently denounces any restriction on abortion. However the margin was just 32 votes out of 800 cast.

            Several factors worked in RCRC's favor. RCRC launched a very heavy and seemingly unprecedented effort to lobby delegates before and during the conference. The decision on RCRC was scheduled at a time when an estimated 100+ delegates from the U.S.-based denomination's growing African regions (who tend to be more pro-life than their American counterparts) were not present to vote. 

            Delegates had also been treated to several misleading pro-RCRC statements before they voted, such as a distributed RCRC flyer's claim that the group had never "supported the use of partial-birth abortion." (As a matter of fact, RCRC has for years consistently lobbied against any attempt to limit this barbaric practice opposed by United Methodism's "Social Principles"). At one point a liberal bishop took the very unusual step of directly testifying to delegates in favor of RCRC. 

            Nevertheless, the vote on RCRC was closer than at any previous United Methodist General Conference. By the end of the General Conference, abortion opponents had gained significant ground without losing anything that they already had. 

            While the pace has been much more gradual than many of us would like to see, the trend of the last 20 years for the United Methodist Church's public witness on abortion has been in a clearly pro-life direction. If pro-life United Methodists continue to stay within their denomination and build on previous victories, it should only be a matter of time before United Methodism more wholeheartedly joins the ecumenical effort to defend vulnerable human life. 

            It is worth remembering that there is recent precedent for a denomination becoming pro-life. In this last generation, we have seen America's largest Protestant denomination, the Southern Baptist Convention, progress from having an official position of strong support for legalized abortion--with prominent denominational officials lobbying against abortion restrictions--to today being an indispensable bulwark of the pro-life movement. 

            Please send your thoughts and comments to daveandrusko at hotmail.com. 

            http://www.nrlc.org/News_and_Views/May08/nv052908.html         
           

      Invite a friend to Join Today's News And Views!

      Today's News and Views --- Send this page to a friend!
     DONATE
            Help Support NRLC
           

     

[Change Subscription]   [Cancel Subscription]
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gathman.org/pipermail/apologetics/attachments/20080529/ed0c7aef/attachment.html>