[Pymilter] Maybe seperate peer queries?

[Stuart D. Gathman]

On Mon, 1 Mar 2010, Todd Lyons wrote:

> One of the things that kinda bugs me about peer queries is that a new
> entry gets pushed onto the circular queue.  What do you think about a
> new query type called P which does the same as a Q query except don't
> create a new UMIS, so it doesnt push it onto the circular queue.

That could be useful.  That would prevent voting later, but in many
situations, it is purely a query.  Another way would be an empty or
otherwise trivial UMIS to prevent adding to the queue.

-- 
	      Stuart D. Gathman <stuart at bmsi.com>
    Business Management Systems Inc.  Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.