[Apologetics] Hillary 2008

[Stuart D. Gathman]

On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Jim Murphy wrote:

> After reading Stuart's comment I'm sure that I don't belong in this
> group.  Please drop me off the list.
> 
> Thanks, The Ungodly

You could always vote for a *truly* godly minority candidate - and
that might make you more holy than us.  I admit that I am voting 
for Bush as the 'lesser of two evils'.  But you'll have a hard
time defending voting for a candidate that publicly promises to 
do evil, and has a 25 year history of delivering on the promise, vs.
a candidate that promises to do good on most issues, even if you are 
correct and he is secretly plotting with the other Skull and Bones members
to do the opposite, and many accomplishments in the previous 4 years
could be considered ineffective (e.g. partial birth abortion ban).

But this gets back to the "all or nothing" issue.  Banning some abortions
is progress - even though it is only a tiny step in the right direction.
Barring civil war, that is the only way to turn around a deeply
ingrained national sin.

If we had approval voting, I would be voting for 

http://www.constitutionparty.com/

as well as the lesser of two evils (Bush).  And I call Bush the
'lesser of two evils' only because of what I consider to be bad
policy (e.g. "no child left behind").  I believe that his faith
is orthodox and genuine.

-- 
	      Stuart D. Gathman <stuart at bmsi.com>
    Business Management Systems Inc.  Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flamis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.