Fw: Fw: [Apologetics] Maximum pain is aim of new US weapon

Ward Collins hik4fun at citlink.net
Sun Mar 6 00:55:41 EST 2005


I understand Jim's pain, as the news release said it was found by accident that is caused pain, they say it kinda feels like getting burned with out the physiological affects of being burned, the thought was hey this could be safer then stun guns now being used and would work against crowds, I think what is REALLY being MISSED is THE WISE PART, the whole intent was to control  with out killing, and WHEN would it be necessary, there is always a disagreement on how to handle crowds and when are they out of hand, I am just glad I do not have to make these kind of decisions.

 ----- Original Message ----- 
From: Jim Murphy 
To: hik4fun at citlink.net ; apologetics at gathman.org 
Sent: 3 March 2005 Thursday 7:56 PM
Subject: RE: Fw: [Apologetics] Maximum pain is aim of new US weapon


OK now i'm begging.  Please take me off this group.

Jim



>From: "Ward Collins" <hik4fun at citlink.net> 
>To: "Apologetics Group" <apologetics at gathman.org> 
>Subject: Fw: [Apologetics] Maximum pain is aim of new US weapon 
>Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 18:25:54 -0500 
> 
>This was on the news in 2001, on I think 60 minuets, I thought it a great idea rather then places like Washington Dc being burned down in a riot or LA, it just needs to be used wisely, that part I am not certain of, however it would be better then being killed? 
>Ward 
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: Stephen Korsman 
>To: Apologetics Group 
>Sent: 3 March 2005 Thursday 3:14 PM 
>Subject: [Apologetics] Maximum pain is aim of new US weapon 
> 
> 
>Maximum pain is aim of new US weapon 
> 
>The US military is funding development of a weapon that delivers a bout of excruciating pain from up to 2 kilometres away. Intended for use against rioters, it is meant to leave victims unharmed. But pain researchers are furious that work aimed at controlling pain has been used to develop a weapon. And they fear that the technology will be used for torture. 
> 
>http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn7077&feedId=online-news_rss20 
> 
>-- 
>Stephen Korsman 
>skorsman at theotokos.co.za 
>www.theotokos.co.za 
> 
>IC | XC 
>--------- 
>NI | KA 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gathman.org/pipermail/apologetics/attachments/20050306/cb263aed/attachment.html>


More information about the Apologetics mailing list