[Apologetics] The rhythm method and embryonic death

[Stuart D. Gathman]

On Wed, 31 May 2006, Stephen Korsman wrote:

> Now Bovens suggests that for those concerned about embryo loss, the rhythm
> method may be a bad idea. He argues that, because couples are having sex on
> the fringes of the fertile period, they are more likely to conceive embryos
> that are incapable of surviving.

The FUD also misrepresents the chief concern when comparing NFP
to condoms: the separation of sex and procreation.  Which joins the
panaply of separations modern liberal thought has given us:

Separation of sex and procreation
Separation of fact and value
Separation of church and state (as opposed to the anti-establishment
  policy actually in the constitution and advocated by the American Founders).

 and even in my view

Separation of food and nutrition

-- 
	      Stuart D. Gathman <stuart at bmsi.com>
    Business Management Systems Inc.  Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.