[Gathnet] Now it comes out

Jonathan Gathman jonathan at stl.gathman.org
Tue May 11 18:49:04 EDT 2004


   I correctly stand admonished to distinguish between those committing 
sodomy and other abominable acts and those suffering from homosexual 
tendencies.  Frankly, I never call someone with homosexual tendencies 
who doesn't engage upon them a homosexual anyway.

   I was indeed talking about the kind of person who would photograph 
nude prisoners for apparently Kinder interests, regardless of the costs 
both to themselves, and now to any other person who might be captured. 
As is shown by the recent beheading, the people who did this have now 
caused future prisoners to become practically guaranteed deaths, 
probably gory deaths.

   I stand by the idea that the "Don't ask don't tell" policy is a 
deterrent to actually asking the kinds of questions which would prevent 
such problems.

   I stand by my statement of America's weakest link being sex 
addiction.  Please note that I listed fornication and adultery first, as 
I personally believe that the total preoccupation with these leads to 
the conditions Stuart mentioned, such as abuse by fathers, etc.



Jonathan Gathman wrote:
> Gathnetters,
>   A note I sent to Janet Parshal, the host of "Janet Parshal's America"
> 
> 
> Dear Janet Parshal,
>   When the pictures of Iraqi prisoners (I assume they are real
> pictures) started arriving.  Why are the pictures so pornographic?  In
> the few I saw, there was someone pointed at the man's genitals, each and
> every one seemed to involve nudity in weird situations.  And who in the
> world would  want pictures?
> 
>   Now it is starting to come to light, and I pray that it will
> continue.   When will America wake up? The person who had the pictures
> was apparently homosexual, and his daddy "didn't want him to be a
> scapegoat".  Uh huh.
> 
>   Ladies and gentlemen, wake up, we have homosexuals and perverts in
> the military.  The reason nobody asked the right questions, is because
> we have a "Don't Ask and Don't Tell" policy instated by our wonderful
> previous president.  Homosexuals ask for the job nobody else wants so
> they can feed their perversion.  They take pictures, and at apparently
> expedient times during an election cycle, they parade them through the
> media...
> 
>   Now add the political part.  In an election year, where people are
> proud of the noble part the military has done to secure us from
> terrorism, the left makes sure that pictures show up in the media, who
> gleefully print them, besmirching the military, and thus the job Bush
> has done.  It is in parallel, and together with the lawless judge
> enabled marriage debacle.
> 
>   Am I a conspiritorialist?  Am I the only one who can see the same
> people who are pushing the homosexual agenda at work here for the
> trumped up Texas Sodomy case, the illegal homosexual marriage licenses
> and now the late breaking, surprisingly pornographic prison scenes?
> 
>   People say, "Where do homosexuals get their money?"  I'm beginning to
> wonder whether it is really "all that disposable income" that people say
> it is.  I ask another question, who are the people who want to see
> America die the most?  Who knows full well that the Achilles heel of
> America is not anything military, but it's addiction to sex outside of
> what God Ordained marriage?
> 
>   If the likes of Osam bin Ladin are not directly behind this attempted
> implosion of America by scandal, then they are wishing they had thought
> of it first.  The only thing that has shamed and beaten our military in
> recent years is sexual scandal, because we insist on military action for
> the right reasons, and the right way.
> 
>   Now the Islamic world has always said that America will implode from
> its perversions.  And here it is again, proof conveniently paraded
> before us during a Presidential race.  With the people who helped shove
> the "Don't ask don't tell" policy down the throats of the military and
> who fully support the current the homosexual agenda calling for the head
> of Don Rumsfeld and President Bush. Ironically, blaming them for the
> situation foisted upon America by Bill Clinton (Don't ask don't tell...
> isn't that wonderful?)
> 
>   In short, yes, I believe we have a case of treason here, treason for
> joining the terrorists in damaging the US War effort, for the political
> motive of trying to bring down the current President not by election,
> but by seriously damaging America's credibility abroad.  Does the
> "Reichstag incident" mean anything to anyone?  Where the perpetrators of
> the act blamed others for a despicable act, and gained national power by 
> it?
> 
>   America, if we want to win the war on terror, we have to clean house
> where we are weakest... sex addiction.  Stand up against all sexual
> sins, fornication, adultery and homosexuality.
> 
>   If we don't, we are handing over power to the people who wish to do
> us harm, and doing so for the paltry sum of a few sex favors. We need a
> clean sweep of the military of homosexuals and other perverts, a clean
> sweep of the judiciary of the same, and a whole lot of people on the
> sidelines on their knees before God begging for mercy.
> 
>   God help America.
> 

-- 
Jonathan Gathman
"Think, Speak and Do Well"
Urquhart Family Crest




More information about the Gathnet mailing list